+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 28

Thread: ATS with Bean Animal / Calfo 3-pipe system?

  1. #1
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    2,710

    ATS with Bean Animal / Calfo 3-pipe system?

    I am looking at buying a 120 gallon tank (2x2x4) from our local LFS who is having a tank sale. I wish to use this type of overflow:

    http://www.beananimal.com/projects/sile ... ystem.aspx

    mainly for the silent and fail-safe features, but also because I hate overflow towers, I value square footage, and I do NOT trust overflow boxes. I also (evil laugh) plan to eventually tear a hole in the wall where the tank is going and make it viewable from both sides. Bwahaha! So I want to do a coast-to-coast overflow on the end (2' side) and make the 'stand' to enclose the sides to hide the plumbing.

    But is it feasible to run this type of system with an ATS connected to the overflow?

    The issue here is that in order for the system to run silent, the full siphon standpipe must terminate at least 1 inch below the surface of the water in the sump. Once all the air is purged, this creates a full siphon with a maximum flow of 2000 GPH (2500 GPH actually with my design) using a 1" pipe and 5' of drop. This of course can be throttled back with a gate valve to match the pump output, etc. But how would I divert enough water to an ATS box from this pipe without violating the principle of the design? The way I see it, if I tee off before the gate valve to an ATS, but below the gate valve a full siphon is still in effect, why would the water flow to the ATS at all? It would just get sucked out I would think.

    I could run the ATS off the open channel standpipe, but that would defeat the purpose of the secondary line of defense, and in order to get enough flow, would end up filling up and probably gurgling, flushing, etc and would defeat the 'silent' purpose.

    So the sure-fire solution would be to run the ATS on it's own dedicated pump in the sump. But I'm trying to avoid that if at all possible. I suppose I could tee off the return pump into the ATS...

    Anyways, I'm looking for someone who currently runs an ATS and a 3-pipe system like BA/Calfo. If you respond to this thread, please state if you do this. If you do not, please feel free to throw in your opinions and thoughts, but please take a minute and read through BeanAnimal's design description on the link above. His design is tried and tested, and has not changed since he started his thread (which has been split due to length). I haven't had time to read through it all for obvious reasons (it's frickin' long) so maybe someone else has.

    I posted on BA's RC thread asking if anyone had installed an ATS on such a system but didn't get much of a response. So I figure that someone on here might have thought about it, or even done it.

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    26

    Re: ATS with Bean Animal / Calfo 3-pipe system?

    What timing...I was just read that thread on RC looking for a way to reduce bubbles/noise in my sump coming from my overflows. Right now I have a sock trapping bubbles, but I want to remove it when the scrubber takes off. Anyway, I think I'm going to test this tonight concept tonight.

    I have a 180 with two overflows and two returns. Both overflows are of durso standpipe design. The scrubber is "T'd" off one of the overflows with a ball valve before the scrubber and another ball valve at the end of that overflow. If I cap off the air inlet for the durso on the overflow connected to the scrubber, I should be able to test this idea, minus the emergency third overflow. I'll let you know how it comes out.

    Here's an idea of how it's plumbed.
    Attached Images Attached Images

  3. #3
    Administrator
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
    Posts
    10,566

    Re: ATS with Bean Animal / Calfo 3-pipe system?

    I wish to use this type of overflow
    That is an elaborate version of a "tuned overflow", otherwise known as the Herbie (whose thread is about 5 years long). If you eliminate the 3rd pipe, it becomes simpler, and water level in the overflow fluxuates between the full-siphon and the overflow. I've used it for 4 years.

    So I want to do a coast-to-coast overflow
    Coast-to-coast is only valuable if you want to remove organics from the top layer of water. You can do the same thing by pointing a powerhead at the surface, which also gives you more shimmer.

    But is it feasible to run this type of system with an ATS connected to the overflow?
    Sure. Just "tune" the overflow as normal. Run it a few times first, and simulate different amounts of scrubber growth in the slot.

    The issue here is that in order for the system to run silent, the full siphon standpipe must terminate at least 1 inch below the surface of the water in the sump.
    No, the termination can even be above the water, pouring down into it. When tuned, there are no bubbles/air in the flow.

    This of course can be throttled back with a gate valve to match the pump output
    A tuned-overflow is somewhat self-tuning, because if the return flow goes higher, the level in the overflow box goes up, and this puts more pressure on the drain, which then drain faster.

    But how would I divert enough water to an ATS box from this pipe without violating the principle of the design?
    Just do some dry runs first. It's no different than sump level changing; it causes variable back-pressure on the overflow, which causes level changes in the overflow box. In your case, the slot will be causing the variable back pressure. You won't need a T at all if you size it right. Just make sure that you have about a 2 inch level difference between siphon overflow and emergency overflow. When tuned correctly, there will be a slight trickle down the overflow at all times. Don't forget to test the emergency overflow by completely blocking the full-siphon.

  4. #4
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    2,710

    Re: ATS with Bean Animal / Calfo 3-pipe system?

    Quote Originally Posted by SantaMonica
    I wish to use this type of overflow
    That is an elaborate version of a "tuned overflow", otherwise known as the Herbie (whose thread is about 5 years long). If you eliminate the 3rd pipe, it becomes simpler, and water level in the overflow fluxuates between the full-siphon and the overflow. I've used it for 4 years.
    EDITED: Yes, I've read the RC thread that battles it out - good to know that you are using the Herbie. As far as I understand, the 3rd pipe is the open-channel standpipe, in case #1 clogs and the emergency pipe can't handle the flow, it takes over as a 2nd full siphon, and under normal operation it takes the excess flow so that #1 remains a true full siphon, and the emergency #3 pipe is always dry.


    Quote Originally Posted by SantaMonica
    So I want to do a coast-to-coast overflow
    Coast-to-coast is only valuable if you want to remove organics from the top layer of water. You can do the same thing by pointing a powerhead at the surface, which also gives you more shimmer.
    I'm with you. The coast-to-coast specifically calls that feature out for increasing the effectiveness of a Skimmer based system, which we don't care about. This is from BA's site:

    Quote Originally Posted by BeanAnimal.com
    The faster we pull the organics from the display tank into the skimmer, the faster we can remove them before they are consumed by algae in the tank.
    So it almost goes saying that there *could* be some value to surface skimming to an ATS. But I'm sure this is a very negligible increase. Shimmer would probably be better anyways since I'll be doing 96 LEDs.


    Quote Originally Posted by SantaMonica
    But is it feasible to run this type of system with an ATS connected to the overflow?
    Sure. Just "tune" the overflow as normal. Run it a few times first, and simulate different amounts of scrubber growth in the slot.
    Sounds good. As you told me way early in my 120 thread, "Ok think of it as a PID controller. Flow is input, growth is output, and the output is inverted before feeding back to the input." so unless the tube gets clogged with something that blocks flow to the screen completely, I should have a full column of water providing pressure to the slot, which should prevent algae growth into the slot to the point of clogging (at least, in a week or two's time)

    That being said, to keep the open channel standpipe from gurgling or flushing, I'll have to make sure I keep it 1.5" ID.


    Quote Originally Posted by SantaMonica
    The issue here is that in order for the system to run silent, the full siphon standpipe must terminate at least 1 inch below the surface of the water in the sump.
    No, the termination can even be above the water, pouring down into it. When tuned, there are no bubbles/air in the flow.
    I guess that's not what I understood from reading several posts on the subject in the RC thread, plus on BA's site. It would not run *perfectly* silent if terminated above the water, there might be a splashing sound, but I doubt it would affect the function. The ATS will likely make more sound as the water discharges from the box (this will be an enclosed box ATS)


    Quote Originally Posted by SantaMonica
    This of course can be throttled back with a gate valve to match the pump output
    A tuned-overflow is somewhat self-tuning, because if the return flow goes higher, the level in the overflow box goes up, and this puts more pressure on the drain, which then drain faster.
    This is true, what I can do I suppose is size the return pump & plumbing so that I get about 20% (or more???) over the desired screen flow rate, and the excess would go down the open channel. I suppose I should factor in pump slowdown over time between cleanings as well. More reason to oversize the open channel.


    Quote Originally Posted by SantaMonica
    But how would I divert enough water to an ATS box from this pipe without violating the principle of the design?
    Just do some dry runs first. It's no different than sump level changing; it causes variable back-pressure on the overflow, which causes level changes in the overflow box. In your case, the slot will be causing the variable back pressure. You won't need a T at all if you size it right. Just make sure that you have about a 2 inch level difference between siphon overflow and emergency overflow. When tuned correctly, there will be a slight trickle down the overflow at all times. Don't forget to test the emergency overflow by completely blocking the full-siphon.
    EDITED: When you say "emergency overflow" I assume that correlates to the 2nd pipe in the Herbie system, which would be the 3rd pipe in the 3-pipe system. The emergency 3rd pipe in the beananimal is always dry. It's the open-channel standpipe that will have the 'slight trickle'. If the backpressure gets too high and raises the level in the overflow box too much, the emergency overflow kicks in. If it gets too much for the emergency to handle, the 2nd pipe channel closes (the tube end goes underwater) and that pipe will turn into a secondary full siphon until the overflow box level lowers below the air tube inlet. So what you end up with is an oscillation in the open channel pipe between full siphon and open channel if the slot tube is too clogged.

    I guess this is all just specualtion at this point, it sounds like a calfo 3-pipe system will work.

  5. #5
    Administrator
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
    Posts
    10,566

    Re: ATS with Bean Animal / Calfo 3-pipe system?

    So it almost goes saying that there *could* be some value to surface skimming to an ATS
    For a scrubber-only tank, the only benefit would be air-water surface agitation for oxygen, and possibly, re-routing the surface organic particles back into the column to be used as food.

    That being said, to keep the open channel standpipe from gurgling or flushing, I'll have to make sure I keep it 1.5" ID
    For the emergency overflow, it just needs to be able to handle all the return by itself. Gurgle is not an issue since it is normally just a trickle.

    This is true, what I can do I suppose is size the return pump & plumbing so that I get about 20% (or more???) over the desired screen flow rate, and the excess would go down the open channel.
    Just size it to handle a 50% blocking of the slot. This is one reason for long slots being better.

    When you say "emergency overflow" I assume that correlates to the 2nd pipe in the Herbie system, which would be the 3rd pipe in the 3-pipe system.
    Yes.

    So what you end up with is an oscillation in the open channel pipe between full siphon and open channel if the slot tube is too clogged.
    That's one reason I like Herbie better, no oscillation. Plus only two pipes.

  6. #6
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    2,710

    Re: ATS with Bean Animal / Calfo 3-pipe system?

    Quote Originally Posted by SantaMonica
    That being said, to keep the open channel standpipe from gurgling or flushing, I'll have to make sure I keep it 1.5" ID
    For the emergency overflow, it just needs to be able to handle all the return by itself. Gurgle is not an issue since it is normally just a trickle.
    Quote Originally Posted by SantaMonica
    This is true, what I can do I suppose is size the return pump & plumbing so that I get about 20% (or more???) over the desired screen flow rate, and the excess would go down the open channel.
    Just size it to handle a 50% blocking of the slot. This is one reason for long slots being better.
    What I was referring to here was sizing the system for the maximum flow (clean screen, clean pump) and for minimum flow (dirty pump, clogged screen - which kind of offsets until you clean the screen). The point here being that as the pump GPH slows down over time, the full siphon may require a slight adjustment as the pump output drops so that a full siphon is maintained, meanwhile the open-channel standpipe (which is not an emergency pipe) needs to be large enough to handle the full additional flow not handled by the siphon standpipe when running a clean pump and partially clogged screen while maintaining a laminar flow.

    Quote Originally Posted by SantaMonica
    So what you end up with is an oscillation in the open channel pipe between full siphon and open channel if the slot tube is too clogged.
    That's one reason I like Herbie better, no oscillation. Plus only two pipes.
    If your slot was clogged with the Herbie, you would get the same oscillation effect. The Herbie, if I understand it correctly, is a full siphon standpipe and the emergency standpipe (upturned elbow) that runs with only laminar flow (excess from siphon). If the slot tube was partially blocked, then the emergency overflow would fill up and turn into a partial siphon and flush the overflow box, then drain out, then fill up. The concept is the same.

    In the 3-pipe system, the open standpipe is designed to take on the laminar flow, but has an airline connected to the capped top that leads to a point above level of the upturned elbow of the emergency pipe. If the emergency cannot handle the excess from a blocked main siphon standpipe, the tube goes underwater and seals the open channel, turning it into a siphon standpipe which will flush the overflow box (and completely take over the job of the full siphon, if it is indeed fully clogged) and then and only then will you get the oscillation effect. For this to happen actually, the main siphon would have to get completely blocked, because the open channel and emergency would be running w/laminar flow for wuite a while before oscillation kicked in.

    Regardless, I'm not even 100% sure that this type of oscillation would occur. I guess it's worth thinking about, but once I get to building it, maybe it will all be fine...

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    26

    Re: ATS with Bean Animal / Calfo 3-pipe system?

    Well it seems you've hashed it out, but I wanted to add one thing that may be obvious to you but wasn't to me at first. I wasn't able to fully implement this tonight because with two separate over flows I need more pipe to extend one of the overflow pipes to just above the water level of the tank. Anyway, what I did find was that by cutting off the air flow on the durso overflow connected to the scrubber and adjusting the ball valves to create the siphon all micro bubbles coming from the scrubber were eliminated. This allowed me to run more gph over the scrubber which created a more even flow over it.

  8. #8
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    2,710

    Re: ATS with Bean Animal / Calfo 3-pipe system?

    Interesting! So a full siphon feeding the screen could really be the way to go! I hope I pass my PE test, or else it will be next year before I get to try all this out and that will suck.

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    27

    Re: ATS with Bean Animal / Calfo 3-pipe system?

    Not sure if it helps. But couldn't you use a P-trap inline between overflow and ats pipe to replicate the effect submerging the pipe would have on the siphon? I haven't used either of these overflow options but I'm guessing that submerging the siphon side is to create a seal for restarting. A P-trap I believe would have the same effect if that's it's only purpose.

  10. #10
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    2,710

    Re: ATS with Bean Animal / Calfo 3-pipe system?

    Bean covers that somewhere in his thread. For a full siphon, it doesn't really do that much, and add friction if anything. I'll have to see if anyone else put one on their and see why.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts