+ Reply to Thread

Thread: The new Upflow Algae Scrubber (UAS)

  1. #191
    Administrator
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
    Posts
    10,566
    Yes there is more water to travel through, but I think that carbon was limiting in most waterfall situations, not light. Also, with LEDs, light is probably not going to be lacking at all.

  2. #192
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Uk! England
    Posts
    1,212
    Quote Originally Posted by SantaMonica View Post
    Yes there is more water to travel through, but I think that carbon was limiting in most waterfall situations, not light. Also, with LEDs, light is probably not going to be lacking at all.
    Agreed. That's why I am trialing my air injection method. If it works as I expect, co2 depletion should be a thing of the past. If it doesn't work, I will definitely try your method.

  3. #193
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    461
    Quote Originally Posted by Garf View Post
    I started a thread a while back called Co2 turbo. I asked the question about perhaps injecting the ATS feed pump with Co2 or air. Surely the benefits of this new design is accomplished by doing just that. Lots of bubbles on the screen, more light than the new design, lot less messing around. Please point out where my logic is faulty.

    Yesterday I started testing CO2 injection into the airflow of the new style scubber.

    There was some concern that it might cause a large drop in PH but it's been running for 24 hours now with only a small effect on PH (8.5 to 8.3, so far), and it appears to be stable (reading hasn't changed since last night, 12 hours ago)


    The next stage will be to set up two identical but separate upflow scrubbers, one with added CO2, and one without and see if it makes any difference to growth.

  4. #194

    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    australia
    Posts
    48

    Michael007's UAS test

    Ok... Here is the first build thread...... wahoo

    I have been playing with the design of this for a while but was waiting for SM to see what was been trialled.... I knew that air injection was somehow going to benefit the algae we grow....

    I have a mate that can supply and cut acrylic real cheap so this thing will probably cost me around $30 to make..... I will eventually build/source a Led fixture to light it...

    HEre is a mock up of my design....

    Screens will be weighted down by acrylic rods zip tied to the bottom of the screens. This way each screen can just be removed from the top of the box for cleaning.
    I have a eden skimmer pump that has a venturi on it which I will use to feed the scrubber.
    At the bottom of the scrubber box there is a feed pipe through a bulk head. This pvc pipe will be cut in half, like an open U that the acrilic rods can seat in. ( to ensure the screens are centred at all times)

    The box is going to sit at the rear corner of the tank. (it is 3 x 3 x 20i)
    The return will overflow back into the tank.... I have a glass pane across the top of the tank at the back that my current AtS sits on. I think I will run the return pipe all the way across it to help with the disipaition of bubbles before it returns into the tank.

    I am just going to run my t5's on it for now but will upgrade to led when I feel I am where I want to be.....

    I am also thinking of cutting up an old skimmer to try something cylindrical. I just think lighting something round is going to be an isssue.... But part of the fun I reckon.....

    Will post results as they occur....I will be comparing the growth I get now from my vertical to this new design. Same tank, same feeding etc....

    cheers

    mick



    Garf said: "Surely you will have to increase your feeding to give your new scrubber something to go at. You don't want to starve your new screen and skew your results."

    Michael007 said: "I will take the vertical off line... I was just meaning I will compare the amount/type/ of growth I get now to the amount/type of growth i get from the new one...."

    Sklywag said: "Did you see my post? Anyway. Besides the round skimmer. There are those HOB skimmers that are clear. CPR brand. If the tank sits far enough from the wall. You can easily fit LEDs on both sides(front & back)of it and paint the sides black. Cut out where the cup goes and hang the screen in it. That would be about 3" wide by 15" long."
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	UAS.001.jpg‎
Views:	749
Size:	35.8 KB
ID:	2178  
    Last edited by SantaMonica; 05-03-2012 at 08:41 AM.

  5. #195
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Uk! England
    Posts
    1,212
    For people with a ph controller, calcium reactor stuff lying around, life would be simpler. Just input co2 when the ph rises to the top limit through algae usage. Not an option for me to try unfortunately.

  6. #196

    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    France
    Posts
    44
    Adding CO2 ? I thought it was a "Simple less expensive" way of filtering a tank ?

    And due by the size of my tank, i'll not put any "box" inside, even les if it contains mineral oil for cooling leds

    What about "i go for vacation, 2-3 weeks" will it survive or the skimmer will be mandatory ? I know with a DSB it's possible
    Hoe often will the bubbler stone/wood need changing due to clogging ?

  7. #197
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Uk! England
    Posts
    1,212
    I see the co2 experiment that Rumpy Pumpy is doing as more of a challenge to general beliefs. Everyone assumes that co2 injection will drastically lower ph but is that true. Anyway the air being pumped into the air stone or feed pump should contain enough co2 for general usage.

  8. #198

    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    France
    Posts
    44
    I know for FW aquaria, you need a lot of CO2 when the water is not soft enough do drop the PH level by a couple of points.

  9. #199
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    461
    Quote Originally Posted by Garf View Post
    I see the co2 experiment that Rumpy Pumpy is doing as more of a challenge to general beliefs. Everyone assumes that co2 injection will drastically lower ph but is that true.

    I think it is under "normal" conditions.

    But when you run a calcium reactor, you're advised to aerate the outflow to "gas off" any extra CO2 dissolved in the water to prevent an effect on PH (as I understand it anyway, I stand to be corrected) - I guess that running CO2 enriched air through an airstone will achieve the same thing?


    The idea is to increase the amount of CO2 available to the algae bed on the screen, without significantly changing the water chemistry of the system overall.

    There is less than 0.04% CO2 in the air, so adding even a little CO2 to the airflow could have a big effect, theoretically.


    Dunno if it's going to work, I'll let you know.

  10. #200

    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    France
    Posts
    44
    If it's that complicated to get a significant result over a standard design, why bother changing ? Except for "wannbe a scientist" fun experiments.

+ Reply to Thread

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts