+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: hanging into return pump area?

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    138

    hanging into return pump area?

    I am thinking about how to fit an ATS into my sump. The best idea I can come up with due to space constraints is to hang it over two sections of my sump divided by a piece of acrylic. One part is the refugium, the other is the return section. Is there a concern with algae slipping off and blocking the return? My sump could handle the volume if this happened, but would prefer to plan differently if this would be a big concern.

    Thanks.

  2. #2
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    2,710
    Pics of sump might help

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    138


    This is approximately what it looks like. I want to hang it lengthwise across the refugium/return section. I have a center brace in the stand which means I lack vertical space right in the middle. For that reason it would have to be on the left side into refugium, or right side into return section.

    I am thinking the return section would be easier as the water level in both sections is equal.

    Thanks

  4. #4
    Administrator
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
    Posts
    10,566
    Your bubble remover is backwards; it should be under-over-under.

  5. #5
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    2,710
    actually that's not true. Look at these

    http://www.melevsreef.com/allmysumps.html

    Almost every sump I've seen has it this way. I see your point, but with it under-over-under you end up with stagnant scummy water on top of the sump.

  6. #6
    Administrator
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
    Posts
    10,566
    Maybe, but the under-over-under gives twice the bubble removing power, whereas the over-under-over gives only one. Also, whenever the water goes down, it should be in a big wide area, to slow the flow, so the bubbles are not drawn down; the up-portion can be thin and high-flow, since high flow upwards does not matter, since the bubbles are already going up. So the under-over-under actually gives more than twice the bubble removal.

    The over-under-over does not even need the third wall; it does nothing, since the bubbles are going up anyway.

  7. #7
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    2,710
    Kind of, but the 3rd wall in the over-under-over forces whatever bubbles make it through to the surface, and then if the return pump is down as shown, the bubbles will not be as likely to be drawn into the pump, they will more likely make it to the surface.

    For a scrubber-based sump system however, you are right. I'm with you on the concept, but I find it interesting that sumps have been made like this for who knows how long, and the purpose of those up/downs is to remove bubbles. Also I believe the purpose is to promote skimming of the surfaces of water in the sump as this is where crud collects.

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    138
    thought I replied here already?

    Anyway, what about the original question? As it turns out I have only a partition and no bubble trap anyway, this was just a design!

+ Reply to Thread

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts