+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 17

Thread: Scrubbers that did NOT work thread?

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Mapleton, Utah, USA
    Posts
    14

    Scrubbers that did NOT work thread?

    Over the last few years we've made somewhere around 10 scrubbers, both waterfall and recently a few upflow. That, along with small tweaks to existing models, have predominantly resulted in a lot of information about what DOESN'T work, as opposed to what does. While some of the screens have been full and heavy with long thick green 'silly string' algae, most variations have produced thin transparent algae, purple macro algae, or basically no growth. Since there is a section of scrubbers that succeeded on the forum here, what about making a section for ones that failed. After all, knowing is half the battle.

  2. #2
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    2,710
    Haha! I read so much before building my first one that I really haven't made one that didn't work. But, I plan on building a set of "tester" scrubbers to see what works better than others at least...

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Mapleton, Utah, USA
    Posts
    14
    Here's a video of a scrubber (UAS) that we modified to be fed by the overflow from the display tank. Growth almost 100% stopped when we did this. It was working great when the scrubber was fed by a small 150GPH pump, and air bubbles from a two bubble wall tubes that were placed in the bottom of the scrubber box. I think we have a video of that version working well that I'll try and find.... but since this is for build that did NOT work, I'll try and stick to just failed mods. The air bubble wall tubes were removed for this version since there was a lot of air coming down the overflow (from a durso drain), the flow from the display tank is around 800GPH last time I measured it, and the lights are 8x 1w 660nm reds on each side, about 2.5" from the screen. Again, keep in mind this same box, lights, setup was working great when fed by a slower 150GPH pump, and air stones, so the lighting is good- just maybe not good enough for the increased flow...

  4. #4

    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    usa
    Posts
    112
    Quote Originally Posted by Floyd R Turbo View Post
    Haha! I read so much before building my first one that I really haven't made one that didn't work. But, I plan on building a set of "tester" scrubbers to see what works better than others at least...
    Did you ever get your UAS mod to work?

    I had trouble with the 3x Hog.5's that I tried. I don't here of others so it was me some how thou.

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Mapleton, Utah, USA
    Posts
    14
    Well it worked great when it was fed by just a small pump (150 GPH) and a couple of bubble walls. I suppose I just like to screw with things that are just fine as is, which is why I keep changing scrubber builds. I've had the main tank crash and wipe out almost all coral twice now, so I should probably just leave it alone once a screen is doing well.... maybe I need a shrink?

    Here's a picture of the scrubber when connected to the air tubing lines (going in at top right of the box) and the water feed pipe (at the bottom) from the 150GPH pump. Also, this picture is before I added 2 reflectors above and below the light bars (so looks a little different than the videos).
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0752.jpg
Views:	328
Size:	82.4 KB
ID:	3729

    And here is 7 days of growth on that setup:
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0758.jpg
Views:	357
Size:	88.9 KB
ID:	3730

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Mapleton, Utah, USA
    Posts
    14
    Here's a video I just made of the current variation, which is showing a much better growth (anything from nothing is an improvement though, so maybe it still won't be a winner build). This mod removed the fixed screen in the middle, and attached the screen to the water-in side, so the flow of the water makes the screen float from side to side... Allowing the algae on the screen to get closer/further from lights on each side, and passing though different air-bubble densities. This video shows the screen 5 days since it was cleaned. The Display tank is now also using a skimmer again, and phosban in a reactor. I'll shut those off in a week or two, so long as there is continued growth of some sort on this moving screen version.


    Note: Change the quality of the videos so it's not so blurry. Youtube will default to 360p usually, so you have to click the Gear icon at the bottom of the video and select 720p.
    Last edited by Expressions-LTD; 12-22-2012 at 01:09 PM. Reason: Blurry videos

  7. #7

    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    usa
    Posts
    112
    Its amazing to see all the different designs. I really like how it floats back and forth like it is. I would think that this would help get the nutrients to the algae. Growth looks good.

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Mapleton, Utah, USA
    Posts
    14
    Here are 3 pictures from a previous build using the waterfall style ATS. This build was set up much like my current UAS scrubber as far as lights go, just had more LEDs. The scrubber screen was 15" long, 6" wide, and received 16 1w LEDs on each side, from 2.5" away. These LEDs were 14x 630nm (red) and 2x 460nm (blue), per side. Growth was very dark at first, but after a few weeks turned very green and full. So the algae will grow off 630nm red, although 660nm is better. The blue led being in the mix is also good, but not absolutely necessary. We did grow good algae on just red, but never as thick as when the blue was there. The part of this old waterfall scrubber that FAILED is it was probably too big for the 2 cubes a day feeding. Once the tank was 'cleaned' (took a few months after these pictures), the scrubber started to grow very splotchy, and thin hair-like algae over most of the screen. So, I made the current smaller UAS version that is now running.

    About 3 weeks in:
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0411.jpg
Views:	349
Size:	90.9 KB
ID:	3731

    About 5 weeks in:
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0459.jpg
Views:	338
Size:	92.3 KB
ID:	3732

    About 7 weeks in:
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0506 (2).jpg
Views:	373
Size:	87.2 KB
ID:	3733

  9. #9
    Administrator
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
    Posts
    10,576
    Assuming the overflow bubbles are as much as the air pump bubbles, it might be that the overflow bubbles have been in contact with the water longer and thus more CO2 has been removed from the air into the water before it hits the scrubber.

  10. #10

    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    usa
    Posts
    112
    Quote Originally Posted by sabbath View Post
    Did you ever get your UAS mod to work?

    I had trouble with the 3x Hog.5's that I tried. I don't here of others so it was me some how thou.
    Opps I miss read and thought that you started a general. What worked and did not work by all readers to learn from.. Never mind. As I have been struggling for many months to get this stuff figured out and read it wrong.

    Looking like yours has kicked in now!

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts