+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 17 of 17

Thread: Scrubbers that did NOT work thread?

  1. #11

    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Mapleton, Utah, USA
    Posts
    14
    I was just suggesting a forum category just for what not to do with a scrubber, and I could post some of these things there, along with anyone else's failed attempts.

    For the CO2, that's a thought. I was thinking about adding some fart valves (air traps and release vents) on the return before it gets to the scrubber to reduce the air, and then supply the scrubber with the air bubblers again. If it works, then I'd say its very likely you are right about that possibility of low CO2 in the return air.

    Question: If low CO2 limits the growth, then a typical waterfall style scrubber box that is mostly sealed (not air tight though)... Is a few small gaps in the box enough to move the necessary air (with CO2) through for the algae?

  2. #12
    Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    pennsylvania, usa
    Posts
    406
    Scrubbers that did not work for me:

    My first scrubber I was running the lights 24/7. Fail

    My second scrubber the screen was 28" x 14". Yup.. sized for like 10,000 cubes.. Fail

    My third scrubber I was running only like 10gph per inch of screen.. fail.

    Then I got it to start working and the only fail that I've had since then is the UAS which did not work for me.

  3. #13
    Administrator
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
    Posts
    10,578
    Could also try a venturi in the overflow.

    A "sealed" waterfall box is not sealed at all, when it comes to vapor pressure.

  4. #14

    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Mapleton, Utah, USA
    Posts
    14
    Found a video of the previous build that did work well. Perhaps you can see from it the difference in the air bubbles. The bubble wall tubes made very even, large bubbles. The current scrubber that's not growing has lots of much smaller air and a lot of turbulence.

  5. #15
    Administrator
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
    Posts
    10,578
    I do think that larger bubbles will generally work better.

  6. #16

    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Mapleton, Utah, USA
    Posts
    14
    Although not necessarily in line with the subject I started this thread with... it appears that having a moving screen that can pass through the air, or closer to the lights, is a way to fix a failed scrubber (at least the way this one is configured). This is after a week of it being allowed to move (from the above vids).
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2192.jpg
Views:	266
Size:	89.4 KB
ID:	3789
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2193.jpg
Views:	251
Size:	96.4 KB
ID:	3790

  7. #17

    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Usa
    Posts
    135
    What exactly do you mean and how did you have a moving screen?

    Ah, UAS version..

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts