I do like my scrubber, it does grow some algae. However, it seems to be slow and just doesn't get the job done. My nitrates got to zero and are now staying there, but my phosphates just won't get under control. I had them all the way down to .03, but as of yesterday they bounced back up to .18. This is 2 weeks after a cleaning and also with 1.5 cups of BRS GFO running.
It seems like the GFO is going all the work and exhausting itself quickly. I can't afford this, that's for sure...if I can't figure out how to get the scrubber to help I'll have to get a skimmer...so be it.
I did start thinking about my turnover rate and that it is possibly a part of the problem. My return pump is turning over somewhere around 120 gph on my 90 gallon tank. Maybe that's just way too low to get enough tank water exchanging with the sump to clean it. The live rock in the tank is processing the nitrates...but the phosphates just aren't getting down to the sump to be dealt with?? Looking for opinions on what increasing this flow would do as far as the effectiveness of the scrubber? Most tanks I see have a much higher turnover than what I am running, that's for sure. I would think most folks on a 90g turn over 400-500 gph?
I would love to improve my lighting...current a 40sq in screen with 2 23 watt CFLs. This should be enough, but it seems many on here seem to think lighting increase would help it run better. Leds would be cool, but my space under the tank is limiting (only 21" clearance with an 18" high sump). A nice enclosed ATS with LEDs just isn't going to happen.
Thanks for offering your opinions on this water turnover question....I gotta win this phosphate battle without using $5-10 of GFO every 2 weeks!