+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Micro or macro ?

  1. #1
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Uk! England
    Posts
    1,212

    Micro or macro ?

    Is filamentous algae, micro or macro algae. Seems to me that it's micro algae that reproduces laterally, but countless times posts have been sidelined because it doesn't apply to macroalgae. Surely macro algae has holdfasts, thallus, fronds etc, whereas hair algae has none of these.

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    84
    The main ones we deal with are microalgae. They are a linear assemblage of cells compared to the unicellular, multinucleate forms of algae like Caulerpa. Other algae are multicellular and colonial, but don't achieve the same efficiency as filamentous forms.

  3. #3
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Uk! England
    Posts
    1,212
    So, as I suggested, the algae we grow on our screens are micro, not macro. Cheers Amphiprion

  4. #4
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    940
    So is Bryopsis corticulans a macro or micro algae? That is the type I can't get out of my display. It is the 'fern' or 'feather' algae.

    According to my google search it seems like it fits the 'macro' definition.
    Like its close relatives, Codium and Caulerpa, this siphonous green alga is actually one huge multinucleate cell. Like Caulerpa, Bryopsis produces chemicals which are distasteful to many herbivores.

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    84
    Lol, it gets tricky, because the terms don't necessarily always imply relatedness. Bryopsis would more closely be a filamentous (or siphonous) macroalga, as is implied in your quote. Common Derbesia would be the same, technically.

    On the other end of the spectrum, many scientists refer to filamentous algae separately from micro- and macroalgae. It's a bit confusing, really, but the filamentous types I've looked at on scrubbers (at least mine) under a microscope are filamentous "micro"algae. It really just boils down to growth form in the end, though, and the terms aren't 100% precise.

  6. #6
    Administrator
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
    Posts
    10,565
    It handy to refer to attached growth at "macro", and phyto as "micro", even though microalgae can attach.

  7. #7
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Uk! England
    Posts
    1,212
    Quote Originally Posted by SantaMonica View Post
    It handy to refer to attached growth at "macro", and phyto as "micro", even though microalgae can attach.
    So, this thread - http://algaescrubber.net/forums/show...ne-Allelopathy
    does actually apply to our systems.

+ Reply to Thread

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts